- “Mine is probably the only calculator that assumes one’s spending does not quite keep pace with inflation in our later years.”
- “My calculator is one of the few out there that isn’t sponsored by a bank or investment company. I’m not selling anything other than the best income estimate possible. Also, it is the only calculator to my knowledge that explicitly shows how much better you do if you buy an annuity or defer CPP (Canada Pension Plan).”
Deferring CPP: Sometimes people shouldn’t wait until age 70
For me, deferring the CPP ship has already sailed. I took it at 66 when my wife retired, although she waited until 68 to take hers. We had initially planned for her to wait until age 70, but we did it sooner because Vettese’s articles argued for an exception to his usual recommendation to wait until age 70. In 2022 and in 2023, he suggested that those on the cusp of turning 70 might take CPP a year or two early, owing to the high inflation adjustments Ottawa made to CPP and Old Age Security (OAS) in those years.
But partial annuitization is very much still a possibility. My wife’s locked-in retirement account (LIRA)—which she opened when working—is likely to turn into a life income fund (LIF) sometime this year or the next. She has no employer pension, and I have only what I have dubbed a “mini” pension and an even smaller “micro” pension from previous employers.
How to use annuities in retirement
So, I’ve always read, with interest, Vettese’s views about annuitizing at least part of RRSPs once they must be wound up at the end of the year one turns 71. At one point he suggested annuitizing 30% of RRSP assets, though the current book lowers that to 20%. (See also this Retired Money column on that very subject, written early in 2018 entitled: RRIF or Annuity? How about both?)
Incidentally, the third edition of the book also mentions a couple of annuity-like innovations that weren’t available when the first two editions were published. In chapter 16, entitled “Can we do even better?” Vettese described Purpose Investments’ Longevity Pension Fund and Guardian Capital’s Guardpath Modern Tontine Trust.
He says that instead of annuities issued by Canadian insurance companies, these two new longevity financial products are offered by investment companies, thus chiefly use stocks and bonds for income.
One difference is that, unlike with traditional annuities, the income is not guaranteed. Also, there are no survivor benefits. He concludes the chapter, stating both are “like a less nerdy version of annuities for retirees prepared to take a small amount of risk.”
But back to PERC
You can try a stripped-down version for free and with no obligation. In fact, you’ll have to print out the results because of privacy concerns: “The data from PERC is stored, but it’s not attached to anything that could reveal one’s identity,” he told me.
If you want the full treatment with multiple scenarios, the price for a one-year subscription to a Canadian customized PERC is a reasonable $135 plus tax. You can enter the basics of your financial situation and that of your spouse (which Vettese recommends) and, in less than a half an hour, the PERC generates a summary of your likely future retirement income. You enter pre-tax amounts for pensions and other income and PERC handles the tax side of it automatically.